Persian Language International Teaching Studies

Topicalization Processing in Persian Sentences by non-Persian Learners (An Analysis based on Van Patten Input Processing Theory)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Azfa PhD student, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Linguistics Department, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The importance of the concept of input is widely known in different areas of second language learning. The purpose of the descriptive-analytical research is to investigate two important principles (First Noun Principle and Event Probabilities Principle) according to the input processing model of Van Patten (2015) in intermediate, upper-intermediate and advanced Persian learners. In this research, we seek to know to what extent these two principles explain input processing. The participants of the research were 30 Persian learners from different nationalities, who were selected by available sampling method. Due to the lack of access to more Persian learners, there were only 10 Persian learners at each level. The participants were asked 14 sentences and they were asked to identify subject and object in each sentence. Findings showed that the two principles "first noun" and "event probabilities" affect the understanding of meaning and input processing in Persian learners of intermediate level more than upper intermediate and advanced level, and this result is in accordance with the input processing theory of Van Patten. We also found that doubts in the answers are more in the basic levels than in the advanced levels, which can be rooted in the level of proficiency of Persian learners.

Keywords

  1. رستمی، اعظم و صحرایی، رضامراد (1400). «بررسی تفاوت‌های فارسی گفتاری و نوشتاری فارسی‌آموزان خارجی برمبنای نظریه پردازش درون‌داد» (مقاله علمی پژوهشی). پژوهش‌نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی‌زبانان. DOI: 10.30479/JTPSOL.2021.11860.1457 
  2. Corder, S. P. (1967). “The significance of learners' errors”. IRAL, 5, 161-170. 
  3. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell publishing.
  5. Ellis, N. (2002). “Frequency effects in language processing”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
  6. Ellis, Rod. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20 (3), 405-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816628627
  7. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum.
  8. Grady, W., Lee, S, O. & Lee, J. H. (2011). Practical and Theoretical Issues in the Study of Heritage Language Acquisition. Heritage Language Journal. (NO PAGE NUMBER)
  9. Haghani, M., & Maftoon, P. (2016). “The Impact of Learning Styles on the Iranian EFL Learners’ Input Processing”. Journal of Language and Translation, 6, 2, 11–26. http://www.iaujournals.ir/article_528747_34541af4517d3d65414677e66e47bf1a.pdf
  10. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
  11. Marsden, Emma. (2006). Exploring Input Processing in the Classroom: An Experimental Comparison of Processing Instruction and Enriched Input. Language Learning 56:3, pp. 507–566
  12. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. New York: Routlege Publishing.
  13. Patten, V. B., & Benati, A. G. (2010). Key terms in second language acquisition. Continuum international publishing group. London.
  14. Pienemann, M. (1989). “Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses”. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79.
  15. Sanz, C., & VanPatten, B. (1998). “On input processing, processing instruction, and the nature of replication tasks: A response to Salaberry”. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 2, 262-273 https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.2.263
  16. VanPatten, B. (1993). “Grammar instruction for the acquisition rich classroom”. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 433–450.
  17. VanPatten, B. (2002). “Processing instruction: An update”. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.
  18. VanPatten, B. (2015). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  19. VanPatten, B. (2015). Input Processing in Adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 113–134). New York: Routledge.
  20. VanPatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  21. White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
  22. Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary (pp. 187–205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  23. Wong, W. (2005). Input Enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Persian Language International Teaching Studies
Volume 8, Issue 13 - Serial Number 13
Spring & Summer
June 2023
Pages 307-336
  • Receive Date: 06 August 2023
  • Revise Date: 26 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 03 September 2023