An Analysis of Persian Language Teachers' Skills, Attitudes, and Technological Knowledge Based on the TPACK Framework

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, and Instructor at Farhangian University, Hamadan.

Abstract

With the expansion of digital technologies and the introduction of artificial intelligence in language teaching, this study investigates the level of use, attitude, and skill of Persian language teachers in using educational technologies. The present study was conducted by a descriptive-survey method and through the distribution of a researcher-made questionnaire among Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers (AZFA) inside and outside the country. SPSS software was used to analyze the data obtained from the participants' responses. The analysis of the results shows that although teachers have a positive attitude towards the use of technology in education, their use of these tools in classrooms is limited and often not in line with educational goals due to many reasons such as "limited access to educational hardware and software, lack of transparent policies of institutions in the field of educational technology, high costs of equipping educational centers, and lack of technology training courses for teachers". The comparative results between teachers inside and outside the country did not show any significant difference in this regard. This study ultimately provides operational solutions to improve the current situation that can help educational policymakers and managers of Persian language teaching centers optimize the use of educational technologies.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Abdi, R. & Mahmoodi, F. (2013). The use of computer and internet in language instruction. In D. Tafazoli & S. C. Chirimbu (Eds.), Language and technology(pp. 31–39). Khate Sefid Publication.
  • Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115–125.
  • Ahmed, K., Corbett, G., Rogers, M. & Sussex, R. (1985). Computers, language learning and language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  • Alavi, S. M., Borzabadi, D. & Dashtestani, R. (2016). Computer literacy in learning academic English: Iranian EAP students’ and instructors’ attitudes and perspectives. Teaching English with Technology, 16(4), 56–77.
  • Bostancıoğlu, A. & Handley, Z. (2018). Developing and validating a questionnaire for evaluating the EFL ‘Total PACKage’: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5–6), 572–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1422524
  • Brett, D. & González-Lloret, M. (2009). Technology-enhanced materials. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching(pp. 351–369). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), 223–234.
  • Cheng, K. H. (2017). A survey of native language teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning30(7), 692-708.
  • Das, K. B., Rynjah, B. & Kharbuli, Q. (2018). Knowledge of ICT and computer proficiency in college and university teachers: A survey. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 45–60.
  • Dudeney, G. & Hockly, N. (2018). Blended Learning in ELT. Routledge.
  • Fayazi, M. (2007). The effect of using weblog in writing classes on Iranian EFL learners’ TOEFL[Master’s thesis]. Alzahra University.
  • Florida Center for Instructional Technology (2005-2018). The technology integration matrix. Retrieved from https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix/
  • Gips, A., DiMattia, P. & Gips, J. (2004). The effect of assistive technology on educational costs: Two case studies. Assistive Technology Research Series, 14, 213–218.
  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Technology-mediated SLAEvolving Trends and Emerging Technologies. The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and technology, 382-394.
  • González‐Lloret, M. (2024). The future of language learning teaching in a technology‐mediated 21st century.Modern Language Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)108(2).
  • Hegelheimer, V. & Tower, D. (2004). Using CALL in the classroom: Analyzing student interactions in an authentic classroom. System, 32(2), 185–205.
  • Hubbard, P. (2018). Technology and professional development. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1-6.
  • Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.
  • Kianinezhad, R. (2023). EFL teachers’ attitudes toward online teaching (ATOT): A theoretical review. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381160231
  • Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
  • Kuhlenschmidt, S. & Kacer, B. (2010). The promise of technology for college instruction: From drill and practice to avatars. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010(123), 23–31.
  • Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford University Press.
  • Maghsoudi, M. (2023). Factors Determining the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of the Iranian Preservice English Teachers. Issues in Language Teaching12(2), 1-30. doi: 10.22054/ilt.2023.72069.754
  • Malinina, I. (2015). ICT competencies of foreign languages teachers. *Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182*, 75–80.
  • Mikulan, K. (2008). Multimedia competences of primary foreign language teachers. In H. Sarter (Ed.), Teacher competences and successful learning in early foreign language classrooms(pp. 137–146). Shaker Verlag.
  • Moradi, H. (2025). The role of language teachers’ perceptions and attitudes in ICT integration in higher education EFL classes in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications12(1), 1-12.
  • Nelson, A. S., Santamaría, P. V., Javens, J. S. & Ricaurte, M. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language. Education Sciences15(5), 611.
  • Puentedura, R. (2014, January 1). SAMR: A contextualized introduction [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/15/SAMRABriefContextualizedIntroduction.pdf
  • Roblyer, M. D. & Knezek, G. A. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60–71.
  • Saeed, Y. B. M. (2015). The effect of using computer technology on English language teachers’ performance. SUST Journal of Humanities, 1(1), 64–79.
  • Saeedi, Z. (2013). Care with computer assisted technology. In D. Tafazoli & S. C. Chirimbu (Eds.), Language and technology(pp. 40–47). Khate Sefid Publication.
  • Sarıçoban, A., Tosuncuoğlu, İ. & Kırmızı, Ö. (2019). A technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) sssessment of pre-service EFL teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language.Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies15(3), 1122-1138.
  • Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F. & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre‑service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003
  • seyyedkalan, S. and Mazharpour, D. (2024). A systematic review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of EFL teachers. Journal of Foreign Language Research14(1), 65-87. doi: 10.22059/jflr.2024.372007.1097
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  • Tafazoli, D. (2023). Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-mediated communication in computer-assisted language learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11897
  • Tafazoli, D. & Chirimbu, S. C. (2013). Applications of technology to language classes. In D. Tafazoli & S. C. Chirimbu (Eds.), Language and technology(pp. 17–23). Khate Sefid Publication.
  • Tajaldin, S. Z. & Nematiserkhi, M. (2012). [The effect of computer-assisted instruction compared with traditional method on non-Persian language learners’ learning]. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 1(1), 89–110. [In Persian]
  • Tseng, C. H., Tien, C. Y. & Wang, C. H. (2022). From individual to collective TPACK: Language teachers’ collaborative professional development. Journal of Foreign Language Research (JFLR), 12(1), 1–18. https://jflr.ut.ac.ir/article_97246_en.html
  • Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., ... & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). What explains teachers’ trust in AI in education across six countries?. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-29.
  • Wang, A. Y. (2022). Understanding levels of technology integration: A TPACK scale for EFL teachers to promote 21st-century learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9935–9952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11033-4
  • Wang, J. (2024). In-service teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in English as a Foreign Language classrooms in China: A multiple-case study. SAGE Open. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20965311231193692
  • Zarei, Z. & Saeedi, S. (2014). [Factors affecting the use of computer and technology in teaching Persian to non-Persian speakers]. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 3(3), 45–62. [In Persian]